0x9c5d…fa47 · launch diligence

what a buyer should know before the trade, composed from our own index: which venue created it and how we know, whether it is still trading, who bought first, and what the anchor's onchain demand is doing to the real stock.

venue PONS v2 (config-registered)anchored to MSFTno swap in the 7d windowfound by both detector

the read

✕no trading inside our 7-day window

—liquidity not observed recently (withheld, not zero)

✕1 early buyers, 1 still holding, 1 serial across 3+ launches

✓created through PONS v2

serial early-buyer co-occurrence is a signal, never proof of coordination — the same wording the radar uses for everyone.

thin-underlying disclosure

this launch is anchored to a tokenized equity. minting that stock token means someone buys the real share, so onchain demand here can become buying pressure on MSFT itself. that ratio is published, always, on every anchored launch.

ratio withheld — no fresh average daily volume for MSFT. never computed on a dead denominator.

identity

contract: 0x9c5d…fa47
pool: 0xa2c7…b205
venue hook: 0xe5e7…e044
first seen by us: —
last swap: —
24h volume: —

source: full-chain pool + swap index · launchpad registry (venue attribution) · dexscreener · finnhub (real adv) · updated 6m ago · venue attribution comes from addresses published by each venue and bytecode-confirmed on chain; entries marked config-registered have not had their source read on blockscout, and the badge says so rather than implying more.