loading chain data…
low sample (5 verified calls) — treat the score and win rate as indicative, not proven. the 95% confidence range shows how wide the uncertainty still is.
| evidence | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0x4524…fcf9 | 1h ago | — | verifying | tweet ↗ |
| 0x232c…30d1 | 1h ago | +1% | tracked | tweet ↗ |
| 0x829c…6e1b | 1h ago | — | verifying | tweet ↗ |
| 0xd732…3b88 | 1h ago | +0% | tracked | tweet ↗ |
| 0xeefc…6536 | 1h ago | — | verifying | tweet ↗ |
| 0x62c7…32ea | 1h ago | — | pricing | tweet ↗ |
| 0x4a6e…b8fb | 1h ago | +16% | tracked | tweet ↗ |
| 0x39db…4571 | 8h ago | +5% | tracked | tweet ↗ |
| 0x0139…8888 | 2d ago | +7% | outcome unavailable | tweet ↗ |
| 0x4ec6…735b | 6d ago | — | verifying | tweet ↗ |
source: twitterapi.io · dexscreener · blockscout · updated 47m ago · win = +50% still held at the clocked 24h mark (or a current provisional check before that horizon) — a single peak wick is not a win · calls at −50% or worse count against the score · repeat promotion of the same contract counts once (promos column) · handles can change, the underlying twitter id is what's tracked